Repérez les deux erreurs de rédaction surlignées, cliquez sur chaque clause et remplacez-la avant de comparer votre travail avec la reformulation type.
Type: Exercise block
What it does: Text Editors let learners work inside a realistic document by spotting issues, adding comments, answering questions, and redrafting provisions.
When it is useful: Use a Text Editor when the objective is drafting, document review, risk identification, or explaining why wording is defective.
Related tools: Text Editors, Blueprints, and Drafting form one document sequence. Use a Text Editor to work inside an existing document, a Blueprint to design the document from precedents, and Drafting to create the document from scratch.
Working document: A Text Editor presents realistic drafting rather than a detached question. The document can include instructions, headings, clauses, tables, and the surrounding facts a learner needs to understand how each provision operates.
Interactive drafting: Authors mark exact words or clauses as Redraft tasks, Questions, quizzes, or Comments. The learner finds an issue by clicking the relevant text and works on it in place, keeping the legal problem connected to its contractual context.
Redraft guidance: Every Redraft task has its own instruction, professional sample answer, and drafting recommendations. Feedback can test whether the learner preserved the commercial deal, added objective mechanics, used defined terms consistently, and dealt with the risk the original wording created.
Connected learning: Text Editors can connect tasks to Playbook Plays and combine several review skills in one document. Authors can ask learners to locate defects, explain consequences, select an answer, and produce replacement wording before completing the document.
The situation: Alder Manufacturing is about to appoint Northstar Components as the exclusive supplier of battery-control units for a new product line. The commercial team has agreed a three-year term and a fixed launch budget, but the supplier's first draft lets it change prices without a workable control and attempts to exclude every category of liability.
The problem: Both provisions look short and commercially convenient, yet they make the customer's cost unpredictable and could remove meaningful remedies even where the supplier causes serious loss. The defects must be identified in context and replaced with wording the parties can actually operate.
The simulation: The learner opens the supply agreement, finds two highlighted drafting errors, edits each provision directly in the document, and compares the redraft with a sample clause and targeted drafting recommendations.
The result: Learners practise turning vague commercial intentions into objective price mechanics and an enforceable, balanced liability allocation rather than merely describing what is wrong.